Toyota Highlander Hybrid - This might be the WORST review i'

[G35audioman]

Well, the review isn't bad, but reading it is EXTREMELY tiresome in my opinion. The different fonts, combined with words being crossed out often, make this a difficult read. I'm suprised they allowed this. Check it out.<p><A HREF="http://thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=8429&sid=274&n=157" TARGET="_blank">http://thecarconnection.com/in...n=157</A><p>

[scorpio14]

man i aint even gonna start readin it...<p>whats with this rubbish... cant they do it properly

[Hornbag]

This is terrible...not even a Toyota deserves this crap...

[SV]

that's disgusting. my 11-year old sister could write a better review than this garbage, or she could at least make it <I>look</I> better.<p><B>It's pretty simple to boil Toyota's Highlander Hybrid down to this: It's the Lexus RX400h's drivetrain under Toyota's unpretentious crossover sheetmetal. Not only is that reduction simple, it's pretty much accurate too. So I've driven the Highlander before and I've driven the RX400h before maybe I can review this vehicle by mashing together the two reviews I've written before and throwing in a few tweaks.</B><p>i was trying to figure out <B><U><I>how</I></U></B> someone would be stupid enough to write a review like that, and i think i found the explination.

[knicks125]

Regardless of which review (car) this is for, the style/type of this review is crap. <p>And to know this is from TCC, it is in fact, as SV3 pointed out, disgusting <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emthdown.gif" BORDER="0"> <p>This is why you should never trust reviews, do you own reviews...

[Naga Royal Guard]

looks like someone uploaded a proofread but not corrected article - nothing more

[LEXUS FAN!]

it's stupid how they wrote it...oh well...<p>they took two reviews and edited them, and it looks bad

[G35audioman]

Yea. I would expect something like this from another website, but not TCC. <p>It was dissapointing.

[Blackraven]

<B>The 2004 Highlander Hybrid isn't going to inspire much passion among its buyers, but it will coddle every one of them in comfort through years - nay, decades - of reasonable transportation duty. The extra power is nice, and the third-row seat will keep a few buyers from scurrying over to the Honda store, but this is fundamentally the same vehicle as it was before the hybrid drivetrain was installed and that's plenty good.<br></B> <p>What a joke <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/laugh2.gif" BORDER="0"> . I don't wanna read that thing again cause it's just gonna make me stupid.<p>"That's plenty good". <p>WTF? Only people who aren't good in English say such phrases (perhaps some Japanese but the writer isn't Japanese at all but in fact, the writer is American/or at least very fluent in English).<p>The point is, this article (and perhaps the one who wrote this) is nuts <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/bangin.gif" BORDER="0"> .

[LEXUS FAN!]

what is weird is that they praised the RX, but they gave this car a "so-so" review. They are essentially the same cars