2007 Audi TT [Archive] - Page 2

enit

03-08-2006, 05:21 PM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aphophis »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i think that's a chop, especialy to the back</TD></TR></TABLE>It's not a chop, but the car has camo tape on. I just wanted to show the side profile: the real car is not so stretched. Especiall the green house is not as narrow and long. Proportions on the real car do not look as hot as on the sketch. Of course this is always the issue. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/beigesmilewinkgrin.gif" BORDER="0">

Marticos

03-08-2006, 10:53 PM

First official!!! <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/ylsuper.gif" BORDER="0"> <IMG SRC="http://www.omniauto.it/awpImages/articoli/evidenza/nuova_audi_tt_1442.jpg" BORDER="0"> Source: <A HREF="http://www.omniauto.it/magazine/articolo/1442/nuova_audi_tt.html" TARGET="_blank">http://www.omniauto.it/magazin....html</A>Tech spec:2.0 TFSI 200CV 280Nm 6 gear 240Km/h 3.5 V6 250CV Quattro

aphophis

03-09-2006, 05:23 AM

look above. that picture is already presented <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/bangin.gif" BORDER="0"> I hope this cgi with audi tt roadster wasn't presented until now <IMG SRC="http://forum.softpedia.com/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=99805" BORDER="0">

MadMac

03-09-2006, 07:34 AM

The back is camoed, especially the lights.I tampered with it a bit according to the sketch, I belive I'm pretty close to the real thing: <IMG SRC="http://img482.imageshack.us/img482/3945/newttedit013am.jpg" BORDER="0">The thing between the lights looks like a flip-up spoiler. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/icondrool.gif" BORDER="0">I'm quite excited about this, it's better than I thought.

DoMiNo

03-09-2006, 02:46 PM

Doesn't look like anything new (the pic isn't)... but Edmunds had this up: <IMG SRC="http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/il/news/2006/0309/audi.tt.500.jpg" BORDER="0"> <TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Edmunds »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">INGOLSTADT, Germany Despite persistent rumors, Audi did not introduce the new TT at the Geneva Motor Show earlier this month. Audi fans had to content themselves with the new RS4 and A6 allroad quattro at Geneva, but the company promises a special launch of the second-generation TT on April 9.Meanwhile, if you visit <A HREF="http://www.audi.com/TT" TARGET="_blank">http://www.audi.com/TT</A>, you can catch a glimpse through goodies such as a downloadable screen saver, plus for tech-savvy surfers, there's the option of downloading a picture to your cell phone.Until then, technical information is hard to come by. What we know so far is that there will be a standard 2.0-liter engine with 200 horsepower and an optional 3.2-liter V6 with 250 hp. Both engines will be coupled to a six-speed gearbox, and the V6 variant will also feature the quattro all-wheel-drive system.What this means to you: It won't be long now, TT fans. </TD></TR></TABLE>

against the wall

03-09-2006, 03:37 PM

that roadster is a chop. its not real. the whole front is different from the official pic.

knihc2008

03-09-2006, 05:57 PM

it won't get a DSG box?

HXC Performance

03-09-2006, 06:07 PM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by knihc2008 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it won't get a DSG box?</TD></TR></TABLE>6-speed is standard (referring to the AMOUNT of Gears)The cars will have a 6-SPEED Manual, and a 6-SPEED "DSG"

DSC-OFF

03-09-2006, 06:09 PM

The TT Mk1 upon introduction in 1998 solely had a manual transmission, DSG became an option in the early 00s, no surprise that it might be the same deal here. The DSG in the new TT will most likely make it more faster than the 6spd model (if the GTI V tells us something about that). If it were up to me DSG wouldnt be an option at all in any MY

DoMiNo

03-09-2006, 09:42 PM

If it were up to me DSG would be the only transmission choice......of any car. On Earth.

HXC Performance

03-10-2006, 01:11 AM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DSC-OFF »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The TT Mk1 upon introduction in 1998 solely had a manual transmission, DSG became an option in the early 00s, no surprise that it might be the same deal here. The DSG in the new TT will most likely make it more faster than the 6spd model (if the GTI V tells us something about that). If it were up to me DSG wouldnt be an option at all in any MY</TD></TR></TABLE>I bet DSG and Manual will both be available AT launch.

enit

03-10-2006, 05:59 AM

New spy pics By brenda Priddy & Co.<A HREF="http://www.mph-online.com/web/spyphotos/0037" TARGET="_blank">http://www.mph-online.com/web/spyphotos/0037</A>

Smart22186

03-10-2006, 10:49 AM

ok, looking at those rear lights its really hard to make out what they are going to look like, so i looked at that very FIRST spy pic to see if it revealed anything, and it did. here is the link to the first 1 <A HREF="http://www.thecarconnection.com/images/gallery/9893_SHDKRKXWGELYB.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://www.thecarconnection.co...B.jpg</A> as u can see in that pic, it has a very destinct line running down the side of the whole car yet some how they have managed to hide that with camo. but if u look at the bakc u can see the cloth follows the lines of what i believe to be the rear lights, and u can also make out the reverse light in that pic. it would come from just under the spoiler and meet in a point just under the rear wheel arch then go back to where the trunklid opens. see if some1 can make an accurate chop with this new info im imagining the indicator light would be by the wheeil arch and the reverse light is where shown. you can also make out that the numberpalate holder is kind of a upside down trapezoiz shape which follows on from the boot lid open line. also their is the FOG light at the bottom like old 206. have a look at my effort in paint. its crap for a photoshop but ok to point out my lines. thansk. <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isosceles_trapezoid" TARGET="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isosceles_trapezoid</A> <A HREF="http://www.mph-online.com/web/spyphotos/0037" TARGET="_blank">http://www.mph-online.com/web/spyphotos/0037</A> (latest spy pic). hope this helps. my effort; <A HREF="http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/1471/ttshot28vk.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://img53.imageshack.us/img...k.jpg</A> (source MPH)

aphophis

03-10-2006, 11:23 AM

same spyshots better quality <A HREF="http://www.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos.cfm/country/gcf/spyphotoID/6060310.002/audi/more-new-audi-tt-spy-photos" TARGET="_blank">http://www.worldcarfans.com/sp...hotos</A>

jlaidler

03-10-2006, 12:28 PM

Decidedly less iconic than the origin. Little to no Bauhaus influence present. Just another car now. I wish they had redone the underpinnings and put on the new nose and left the rest the same.

Nurburgring

03-10-2006, 12:54 PM

If it was like that, only you and maybe a couple of others will be the only ones happy that they didnt do a whole redesign.

JBlair

03-10-2006, 01:20 PM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jlaidler »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Decidedly less iconic than the origin. Little to no Bauhaus influence present. Just another car now. I wish they had redone the underpinnings and put on the new nose and left the rest the same.</TD></TR></TABLE>Could you explain what you mean, because pretty much EVERYTHING about this car is subtley evolved and bears more than a direct resemblance to the outgoing model.

Santeno

03-10-2006, 01:32 PM

I would think that he means that while the original had that minimalist industrial bauhaus style of design that was so original and caught everyone's attention. This one is little more than a mild evolution of the same thing, thus not as visually impressive. It's almost a bit too familiar.

jlaidler

03-10-2006, 02:03 PM

what he said ^basically while the original could appear in the museum of modern art, this one has lost the purity of the original and is ordinary. much like the 996 didn't compare to the 993 even though they were both 911s. The 993 is a classic, the 996 is bland. for that matter miata2 was not as good as miata1. miata3 is better. evolutions are sometimes a problem because they lack the purity of the original concept. they must be revisions of existing cars and by nature are then somewhat compromised in design.

DSC-OFF

03-10-2006, 05:49 PM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DoMiNo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If it were up to me DSG would be the only transmission choice......of any car. On Earth.</TD></TR></TABLE>Dont get me wrong, i love DSG, i believe it is absolutely genius, two clutches, instantaneous shifts, what more could be better than that? How about fun with a 6spd standard transmission? :-)

scorpio14

03-10-2006, 07:22 PM

Looks pretty cool.... not as good at the 350Z but yeah... U think there is any chance theyll offer a RSversion of it to take on the Z4M and SLK55 AMG... itll be good if they did.

CWW

03-13-2006, 08:18 AM

<A HREF="http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-2007/2007-Audi-TT-Preview-F-1280x960.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://www.seriouswheels.com/p...0.jpg</A><A HREF="http://www.seriouswheels.com/pics-2007/2007-Audi-TT-Preview-Sketch-1024x768.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://www.seriouswheels.com/p...8.jpg</A>

Charger

03-13-2006, 11:58 AM

<A HREF="http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/03/13/audi-releases-two-new-2007-audi-tt-teasers" TARGET="_blank">http://www.leftlanenews.com/20...asers</A>/

CosworthKid

03-13-2006, 12:08 PM

Dont understand why they call them "teasers" since it reveals the car in full. They should just release official pics since we already know exactly, thru these "teasers" how the TT will look.

CosworthKid

03-13-2006, 03:21 PM

Whats the point of re-posting the exact images? <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/nixweiss.gif" BORDER="0">

VexedandGlorious

03-14-2006, 11:31 AM

when a car goes from skecth to product..it loses alot of emotion and features from the sketch..most cars look nothing like thier concept skecths.. its not always exactly how the car will lookplus people want to see the real thing not a drawing..

Redline

03-14-2006, 01:16 PM

I definently want to see the real thing over the sketch, because those sketches leave me wanting more. Not that I like the design, but I don't like it and I'm hoping the final product will look a little better. Personally, I think this just doesn't have the style that the current one does.

wallabyguy

03-14-2006, 01:22 PM

I really think we need to give Audi a chance here. The original TT was genous. But to judge the new one as mediocre before we actually see it "in the flesh", is premature. I think many will be plesently surprised on the 6th.

kid

03-14-2006, 03:05 PM

does anybody see a little bently conti gt in this picture <A HREF="http://www.worldcarfans.com/spyphotos.cfm/spyphotoID/6060310.002/pageview/photo/photo/Mini3/page/1/country/gcf/audi/more-new-audi-tt-spy-photos" TARGET="_blank">http://www.worldcarfans.com/sp...hotos</A>just with the way the lights are taped up

LEXUS FAN!

03-14-2006, 03:24 PM

hhaha...yea...that's interestingnice catch on the similarity

Smart22186

03-14-2006, 03:45 PM

ok, looking at those rear lights its really hard to make out what they are going to look like, so i looked at that very FIRST spy pic to see if it revealed anything, and it did. here is the link to the first 1 <A HREF="http://www.thecarconnection.co...B.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://www.thecarconnection.co...B.jpg</A> as u can see in that pic, it has a very destinct line running down the side of the whole car yet some how they have managed to hide that with camo. but if u look at the bakc u can see the cloth follows the lines of what i believe to be the rear lights, and u can also make out the reverse light in that pic. it would come from just under the spoiler and meet in a point just under the rear wheel arch then go back to where the trunklid opens. see if some1 can make an accurate chop with this new info im imagining the indicator light would be by the wheeil arch and the reverse light is where shown. you can also make out that the numberpalate holder is kind of a upside down trapezoiz shape which follows on from the boot lid open line. also their is the FOG light at the bottom like old 206. have a look at my effort in paint. its crap for a photoshop but ok to point out my lines. thansk. <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isosceles_trapezoid" TARGET="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isosceles_trapezoid</A> <A HREF="http://www.mph-online.com/web/spyphotos/0037" TARGET="_blank">http://www.mph-online.com/web/spyphotos/0037</A> (latest spy pic). hope this helps. my effort; <A HREF="http://img53.imageshack.us/img...k.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://img53.imageshack.us/img...k.jpg</A> (source MPH)

thedesigner

03-14-2006, 04:55 PM

Has it been established that the new TT is going to have the shield grille? After looking closely at these new spy shots I'm completely convinced the front will look very much like the shooting brake concept after all.

kid

03-14-2006, 06:11 PM

thank ya...just it caught my eye quickly that it had a hint of it with its lights the way they are

DAMIAN_TT

03-14-2006, 07:19 PM

why where my comments and pics lost??

knicks125

03-15-2006, 12:54 AM

Please check your pm. Your pics have already been posted...no need to re-host and re-post. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emthup.gif" BORDER="0">

DSC-OFF

03-15-2006, 05:18 AM

<A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/File0157.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...7.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/e306959f.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...f.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/87302a8d.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...d.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/c4e14e7e.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...e.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/89c9d9ad.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...d.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/a39d3a2d.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...d.jpg</A>These are very early photos of the TT mule that was just published in this months Intersection magazine. It was a legit photoshoot which included male models showcasing designer clothing (hence fashion key on lower hand corners). Kind of too late to publish but it is an emerging magazine<A HREF="http://www.intersectionmagazine.com" TARGET="_blank">Intersection</A>

Regazzoni

03-15-2006, 08:48 AM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DSC-OFF »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/File0157.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...7.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/e306959f.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...f.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/87302a8d.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...d.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/c4e14e7e.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...e.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/89c9d9ad.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...d.jpg</A><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/a39d3a2d.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...d.jpg</A>These are very early photos of the TT mule that was just published in this months Intersection magazine. It was a legit photoshoot which included male models showcasing designer clothing (hence fashion key on lower hand corners). Kind of too late to publish but it is an emerging magazine<A HREF="http://www.intersectionmagazine.com" TARGET="_blank">Intersection</A> </TD></TR></TABLE> I hope you realise this is no 2006 TT mule. This is a prototype of the old 1996 TT. You can see it in almast every pic. This pics can be 10 years old. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emwink.gif" BORDER="0">

DrPetrus

03-15-2006, 10:22 AM

AM2K

03-15-2006, 03:20 PM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Regazzoni »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> I hope you realise this is no 2006 TT mule. This is a prototype of the old 1996 TT. You can see it in almast every pic. This pics can be 10 years old. <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emwink.gif" BORDER="0"> </TD></TR></TABLE>These pictures are not 10 years old. The number plate is British, and the numbers '05' indicate a car made in 2005. Suffice to say, I checked out the registration details of this car and they are:Body type: COUPE Colour: BLUE Fuel type: PETROL Date manufactured: 13 July 2005 This is a car that was snapped quite recently in Britain. If you want to add any fuel to the fire, Audi have confirmed that they are testing prototypes in the UK nowadays to fine tune future cars to UK road settings. Looks like this might be a new prototype then... <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emwink.gif" BORDER="0">

AU297

03-15-2006, 04:01 PM

Those are early test mules with the MkI Body on the MkII Chassis. It also has been brought to my attention that Audi will be having a press conference on April 12th... So the TT will most likely have a showing there. The debut will be earlier though on April 6th as we all already know.

Reppu

03-15-2006, 11:23 PM

The rear spoiler was added more than one year after the TT went on sale, so i also doubt these pics are that old.

ROCKAPIX

03-15-2006, 11:44 PM

Look close ... this car has Aerotwin wipers. They are marketed since 1999.

AM2K

03-17-2006, 09:42 AM

Photos were definately taken after spring 2005. So they are no more than 12 months old. Most likely an early mule was brought over here for testing or publicity reasons...Autocar says it will have official press pics of the Audi TT next month.. look forward to seeing them!

JBlair

03-17-2006, 10:06 AM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AU297 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Those are early test mules with the MkI Body on the MkII Chassis. </TD></TR></TABLE>Ha. Not likely. If they were doing that, you would see the tell tale signs of a widened track, the bigger exhaust pipes that we saw on earlier mules like that, AND they wouldn't have bothered to camo the whole car. In this case you should try looking at the whole spy shot, as the driver's and engineer's clothing are dead giveaways that these are far older than 2005.

Santeno

03-17-2006, 10:21 AM

I didn't know you were a fashionista JB? I thought I was good but I'm nowhere near close to being able to date an image by the clothing people wear in it. I mean if you are going by that driver's Jacket (which looks for all the world like something out of Members Only) I would have to say they were testing this car in the mid to late 70's.

JBlair

03-17-2006, 10:35 AM

I just thought of something else; if this was dated as a 2005, couldn't it be Audi testing a version of the 3.2 liter V6. Whatever it is, I really honestly doubt that its the Mark II.

AU297

03-17-2006, 08:15 PM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JBlair »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I just thought of something else; if this was dated as a 2005, couldn't it be Audi testing a version of the 3.2 liter V6. Whatever it is, I really honestly doubt that its the Mark II.</TD></TR></TABLE>No the V6 was introduced earlier than that, 2003 for europe and 2004 for USA.

JBlair

03-17-2006, 09:21 PM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AU297 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">No the V6 was introduced earlier than that, 2003 for europe and 2004 for USA.</TD></TR></TABLE>I'm talking about the special editions, though I don't know if there were any changes between those and the original V6. The fact still remains, however, that this mule does not look like the other TT Mark I body on TT Mark II chassis mule that was already seen.

DSC-OFF

03-22-2006, 11:46 AM

<IMG SRC="http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/7373/audittinterieursmall0an.jpg" BORDER="0"><A HREF="http://www.autoscoops.net/" TARGET="_blank">Autoscoops</A> <TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DrPetrus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><A HREF="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c306/ef0ne2/File0157.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://i30.photobucket.com/alb...7.jpg</A>Now, this is what a test-car driver should look like. Like he stepped out of a Steve McQueen movie.</TD></TR></TABLE>Key: Jacket by Mulberry Trousers by Hussein Chlayan Shirt by Mulberry Sunglasses by Calvin Klein Shoes by PosteJust in case you wanted to look like Steve McQueen too

kuules

03-24-2006, 03:14 AM

Pictures come from <A HREF="http://www.bilnorge.no/vis_artikkel.php3?aid=28521&tid" TARGET="_blank">http://www.bilnorge.no/vis_art...1&tid</A>= i only made it bigger. <IMG SRC="http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/8686/13ls4.jpg" BORDER="0"> <IMG SRC="http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/9785/20po.jpg" BORDER="0"> <IMG SRC="http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/9026/35ga.jpg" BORDER="0">source: bilnorge.no

AU297

03-24-2006, 06:14 PM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kuules »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Pictures come from <A HREF="http://www.bilnorge.no/vis_artikkel.php3?aid=28521&tid" TARGET="_blank">http://www.bilnorge.no/vis_art...1&tid</A>= i only made it bigger. <IMG SRC="http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/8686/13ls4.jpg" BORDER="0"> <IMG SRC="http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/9785/20po.jpg" BORDER="0"> <IMG SRC="http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/9026/35ga.jpg" BORDER="0">source: bilnorge.no</TD></TR></TABLE>These are CGI's and there is more wrong than right on here.... compare it to everything we have seen and it's obvious. <IMG SRC="http://www.fourtitude.com/gallery/albums//Audi/TT-TT%20Roadster/TT%20(a5)/Design/003.jpg" BORDER="0"> <IMG SRC="http://www.fourtitude.com/gallery/albums//Audi/TT-TT%20Roadster/TT%20(a5)/Design/004.jpg" BORDER="0"> <IMG SRC="http://www.fourtitude.com/gallery/albums//Audi/TT-TT%20Roadster/TT%20(a5)/TT%20Lounge%20Preview/005.jpg" BORDER="0">

erzhik

03-24-2006, 07:17 PM

I can't wait to see this car.. It looks really nice on these drawings

against the wall

03-24-2006, 07:19 PM

they actually look pretty acurate. look at the details of sketch and they match up with the pics. also the whole front looks like a match. they may be cgi's but they are pretty accurate.

JRodrigues

03-25-2006, 06:16 AM

Look ate the rear license plate <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emwink.gif" BORDER="0">

DrPetrus

03-25-2006, 09:25 AM

Aren't they CGI's of a Ford Focus CC?

AU297

03-25-2006, 09:52 AM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by yanksrule26 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">they actually look pretty acurate. look at the details of sketch and they match up with the pics. also the whole front looks like a match. they may be cgi's but they are pretty accurate.</TD></TR></TABLE>Things wrong with it: 1. Grill is wrong 2. Lower front spoiler is wrong 3. Rocker Panels are completely wrong 4. Back valence is wrong 5. Rear license plate surround is completely wrong 6. Crease line with body to roof is wrong 7. Headlights are wrong... shape (too shooting brake)The new TT is a mesh between the current one and the R8 (Set for debut in September, but apparently they are having a sneak preview for a select amount of people next week... so it's complete and ready... it's just waiting for the calendar scheduled release!!!) This is the year for Audi's Sports Cars! Exciting times.I just don't get why they would publish a CGI that is so unaccurate. Come on Spy Photos and design sketches have been available for awhile now.Looking forward to the next few weeks though: April 6th Press Photos released (Not just the sneak pics) April 12th Press Conference @ NY (which I'll be attending <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/beigesmilewinkgrin.gif" BORDER="0"> )

CosworthKid

03-25-2006, 11:13 AM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DrPetrus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Aren't they CGI's of a Ford Focus CC?</TD></TR></TABLE>huh?? <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/bonk.gif" BORDER="0">

against the wall

03-25-2006, 11:36 AM

au297 you cant go by a sketch, most of the time details are exagerated.the cgi may not be exactly what it looks like but it shows the general shape.

AU297

03-25-2006, 02:09 PM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by yanksrule26 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">au297 you cant go by a sketch, most of the time details are exagerated.the cgi may not be exactly what it looks like but it shows the general shape.</TD></TR></TABLE>Who cares about the general shape! We are less than two weeks away from the official release. Yes I know that sketches get exagerated, but the Sketches match the latest spy pictures and Audi's only official picture (Sneak peak of the front), yet this latest CGI doesn't! Thus why I'm confused no one has created a more accurate CGI? Audi has been releasing new images every Tuesday... so we have two more before the official deal April 6th.

Comrade

03-26-2006, 08:07 AM

I agree, this is not a good CGI because... -That crease that goes along the lower body back to the upper part of the bumper is a lot more curvaceous and prominent in drawings and spy shots. -The whole side looks very flat from the in the CGI when in reality there is more dimension and curve. -The line between the rear bumper and fender start from the upper corner of the tail-light towards the wheelarch instead of from below from the lower corner of the tail-light like CGI suggests. -the tail-light is also too high up. -That black (whetever it's called) that's integrated in the lower part of the rear bumper is way too big, it belongs to a larger car: the A6. In fact, the whole rear bumper is that of the A6 and the TT's simply won't look like that. 
Modified by comRADe at 11:12 AM 3/26/2006

Smart22186

03-26-2006, 08:29 AM

as i pointed out on my previous thread. their is a fog light in the botton black bit of the bumper (near the exausts) aka 206

Omar

03-28-2006, 06:59 AM

April 6th looks to be the big day then<A HREF="http://www.topgear.com/content/news/stories/641" TARGET="_blank">http://www.topgear.com/content/news/stories/641</A>/

LEXUS FAN!

03-28-2006, 09:40 PM

<A HREF="http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/8827/tt6fz.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/8827/tt6fz.jpg</A><A HREF="http://thehollywoodextra.blogspot.com/2006/03/next-tt-crash.html#comments" TARGET="_blank">http://thehollywoodextra.blogs...ments</A>the 2 guys died instantly, sadly

haji

03-28-2006, 11:35 PM

looks like, ur, chrysler coupe...

scorpio14

03-29-2006, 12:28 AM

Thats sad ay... i guess the snowy roads had somethin to do with the accident... i wonder if it was a Quattro or FWD version.... if it were FWD then mighta been abit tough on the roads i guess...

Smart22186

03-29-2006, 03:45 AM

Its very sad indeed and to think these people were just doing their job. i suppose the furter and longer you test a car it increases its chances of being in an accident, take the S-class mule for example. i would assume this photo wasnt taken to get some insite as to what the car could look like as a feel it would be very dis-respectful, and that the photo was taken for evidence and just leaked out.

DSC-OFF

03-29-2006, 09:40 AM

DSC-OFF

03-29-2006, 11:34 AM

<IMG SRC="http://homepage.uvt.nl/~s828282/AutoScoops/Scoops/Audi%20TT%20teaser%203%20(Small)_w.jpg" BORDER="0"><IMG SRC="http://homepage.uvt.nl/~s828282/AutoScoops/Scoops/Audi%20TT%20teaser%201%20(Small)_w.jpg" BORDER="0"><IMG SRC="http://homepage.uvt.nl/~s828282/AutoScoops/Scoops/Audi%20TT%20teaser%202%20(Small)_w.jpg" BORDER="0"><IMG SRC="http://homepage.uvt.nl/~s828282/AutoScoops/Scoops/Audi%20TT%20teaser%204%20(Small)_w.jpg" BORDER="0"><A HREF="http://www.autoscoops.net/" TARGET="_blank">AutoScoops</A>

StevenZoz

03-30-2006, 05:36 PM

on a happier not of that other story reguarding the current gen audi tt:<A HREF="http://www.katu.com/stories/84254.html" TARGET="_blank">http://www.katu.com/stories/84254.html</A>

AU297

03-31-2006, 08:05 AM

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by stevenzoz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">on a happier not of that other story reguarding the current gen audi tt:<A HREF="http://www.katu.com/stories/84254.html" TARGET="_blank">http://www.katu.com/stories/84254.html</A></TD></TR></TABLE>Old news... been reposted several times on all boards. Keep it on topic (MkII TT).

Blob

04-06-2006, 09:15 AM

The new TT coupe will be unveiled in 15 minutes!

bm88

04-06-2006, 09:25 AM

<A HREF="http://event.netvision.de/basic_templates_data/849278b899c4c8d03fee0db903b88c42/?session=da1982ac2a74dc07244ba6c8bda0ddc6&menu=login&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_agent%5D=ie&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_version%5D=6&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_platform%5D=win&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_supported%5D=true&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_bandwidth%5D=1990.4&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_screen_width%5D=1024&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_screen_height%5D=768&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_screen_depth%5D=32&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_player_wme%5D=10.0.0.3990&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_player_real%5D=6.0.12.1059&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_player_qt%5D=7048000&browserCheck%5Bbrowser_player_flash%5D=524288" TARGET="_blank">WATCH IT HERE!</A>**May not work.