View Full Version : 2007 Jaguar S-TYPE
12-16-2004, 11:23 PM
old thread:<br><A HREF="http://carspyshots.proboards2.com/index.cgi?board=spy&action=display&num=1075245432" TARGET="_blank">http://carspyshots.proboards2....45432</A><p><IMG SRC="http://bilder.autobild.de/bilder/1/61184.jpg" BORDER="0"><p><IMG SRC="http://bilder.autobild.de/bilder/1/61185.jpg" BORDER="0"><br>SOURCE: <A HREF="http://www.autobild.de" TARGET="_blank">http://www.autobild.de</A><p><A HREF="http://www.autokampioen.nl/content/bla_image/jagustt041206g.jpg" TARGET="_blank">http://www.autokampioen.nl/con...g.jpg</A><p>continue discussion here.
12-20-2004, 07:28 PM
I wouldn't mind at all if it looked like that...
12-21-2004, 05:46 AM
Some translated tidbits from the AutoBild article:<br>rear wheel and AWD options. Aluminium. 3 versions; 4-door Sedan, 5-door Wagon and 5-door Crossover (higher and longer). <br>from 2008 a 3 litre diesel (235 HP). 3.2 litre petrol (250 HP),
12-21-2004, 04:49 PM
I sure hope that Jaguar learns about some safety techniques from Volvo, since the X-Type got a marginal in side-impact testing...
12-21-2004, 05:22 PM
That does look really good, but I hope Jaguar uses a bit less retro in the final design than in the pictures. Some of their more recent concepts look great; very distinctive and modern, they should use more cues from those concepts.
12-22-2004, 05:12 AM
The X-Type may have, but the 2005 S-Type got very good safety ratings (4 stars for front side and 5 stars for rear side impact).
12-22-2004, 08:31 AM
But the S-Type has only been tested by NHTSA. They do tests with a midsize car colliding into the subject whereas the IIHS uses a full-size pickup to collide into the car, making it a much harder test to pass.
12-25-2004, 01:17 PM
Are they going to use XJ8's platform? or it is going to be an unique one? (making it harder because of cost issues?)
12-25-2004, 01:24 PM
12-29-2004, 01:54 AM
As far as the choppers imagination go, I think no one knows for sure how the new jaguar elements would be implemented in the future S-type, but I'm keeping my fingers crossed that Ian Callum would not disappoint.<p>On a different note, if the aluminum chasis shows good advantage, I think Jaguar engineers should make a 300hp V6 out of fords Duratec 35. This would give the S-type V8 performance for V6 price and economy considering the car wieghs less than V6 rivals. IMO it could be a great marketting tool for Jaguar.
02-07-2005, 04:51 AM
<I>Suppliers for the next generation Jaguar S-type will be chosen this spring, sources have told Autocar. Codenamed X250, the new S-type (expected in spring 2007 at the earliest) will be built around an aluminium chassis, but insiders say it is not exactly the same under-structure as the XJs.<p>Problems highlighted when engineering the new XK sports car which is based on the XJ have led to an overhaul of Jaguars aluminium monocoque. Sources say the new chassis should be much cheaper to produce, among other advantages. The improvement is so marked that the XJ replacement has been brought forward.<p>Meanwhile, the facelifted XJ (codenamed X357) is also due in 2007. Expect a new nose, tail and dash design.<p>We also hear the S-type will follow the XJ in breaking the long, low look established with the XJ6 in 1968. Its thought it will have a conventional high-set boot. You cant deny physics forever, a senior figure told Autocar.<br></I> <p><A HREF="http://www.autocar.co.uk/news_article.asp?na_id=213392" TARGET="_blank">http://www.autocar.co.uk/news_...13392</A>
02-07-2005, 06:45 AM
The bottom pic looks like a cross between a rover 75 touring and the RD-6.<p>I'm not to sure what i think of it actually :S
02-07-2005, 08:00 AM
I thought jaguar were trying to wean themselves off the old designs and attempting a more modern approach like the new xk.<br>The images in this post (if correct) are what the present s-type should have looked like when launched..<br>...the overall design is very reminiscent of the original mkII from the 60,s<p>I like it but it is not very modern... I think we all know that a lot of jaguars problems stem from their inability to use fresh design's.. The new xj is a fab car but suffers, as it looks 2much like the original model.<p>Please Jag be creative and use a modern approach to designing your next s-type ..the present one has hardly been a rounding success<br>
02-07-2005, 01:56 PM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>summersun54</b> »</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the present one has hardly been a rounding success<br></TD></TR></TABLE> not true. its amazing. it is very comfortable and Clarkson gave it best exec car 2005.iv seen more of these than 5ers e-class and a6. this is a severe case of don't judge a book by its cover
02-08-2005, 03:28 AM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>revilo_</b> »</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> not true. its amazing. it is very comfortable and Clarkson gave it best exec car 2005.iv seen more of these than 5ers e-class and a6. this is a severe case of don't judge a book by its cover</TD></TR></TABLE><p>I never said they were a bad car they are not, jaguar have done a fantastic job over the course of their 2/3 facelifts o bring it up to the mb E-class levels- old bmw5 series level..<br>I am just saying that thought the world it is not a major player in the way jaguar would have hoped and IMO to do another retro design would be a no brainer for jag.<br>More of the same will go the same way the xj has gone (no where near where it deserves to be sales wise)<br><BR><BR>
<i>Modified by summersun54 at 4:49 AM 2/8/2005</i>
02-08-2005, 05:18 AM
To me the new styling looks too much like the current car. Jaguar is standing still in styling. The new XJ is a gorgeous car but it does not look forward. The S-Type needs to wow people by taking a risk with some serious show car looks that make it to the street. We can only hope that the new XK doesn't get too watered down from its concept car.
02-08-2005, 05:23 AM
Again, this isn't the new S-Type, as penned by Ian Callum. This is an artist's impression. Huckfeldt's impression. He may be good, but I doubt he's been inside Whitley.
02-08-2005, 05:51 AM
fair point..hope your right
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.