CarSpyShots
Quick Member Login:
Forgot password?
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members:
Total Threads:
Total Posts:


There are users
currently browsing forums.
  FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-27-2017, 01:35 AM
StephenKHone StephenKHone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcread View Post
Apparently, SAIC was unable to purchase the rights to the Rover brand name, so Roewe.

Back in the day, Rover was a much respected marque, owned and driven by doctors, lawyers and other wealthy professionals and even the Prime Minister. Admittedly, a couple of decades of British Leyland and later owners have tarnished the reputation.

But Road Rover is something else. It was originally supposed to be what the Range Rover became.
https://www.autocar.co.uk/opinion/in...echoes-history
JLR owns the 'Rover' name through Land Rover.
__________________
SKH

Last edited by StephenKHone; 09-27-2017 at 01:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-28-2017, 06:47 PM
MrMGMan MrMGMan is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 325
Default

Rover's reputation was far too heavily tarnished for it ever to return. It started with the appalling build quality and reliability of the SD1, followed by the underdeveloped 800, a line of fairly obvious Honda rebadges, BMW's failure to invest or make a success of the company, and finally, by MG Rover's bankruptcy and collapse in 2005. The brand values it once epitomised might be eminently saleable, but the Rover name itself would be the kiss of death, certainly in the UK.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-29-2017, 07:56 AM
mick78 mick78 is offline
CSS Oldtimer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 7,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMGMan View Post
Rover's reputation was far too heavily tarnished for it ever to return. It started with the appalling build quality and reliability of the SD1, followed by the underdeveloped 800, a line of fairly obvious Honda rebadges, BMW's failure to invest or make a success of the company, and finally, by MG Rover's bankruptcy and collapse in 2005. The brand values it once epitomised might be eminently saleable, but the Rover name itself would be the kiss of death, certainly in the UK.
Well said, even if I think the rebadged Hondas did look fairly okay (and in the case of the 600/Accord also better looking than the car they were based on), plus their TDI Diesel gave them a useful selling point over their Honda counterpart in the Diesel crazy 90ies (but ultimately well outliving their welcome), generally very well summed up..

And generally this is the problem with brand comebacks. Usually there is a reason a brand dies, and people don't forget that. Even when the bang is smaller (Saab) or not even fully dead (Lancia), a comeback makes little sense. The die hard fans will not accept whatever shows up with their beloved badge, the so so petrol heads will just remember that the last generation (or 2 - 3 before) of those cars were rather rubbish or at least lovable but not competitive or reliable, and something between 75 - 90% will not remember the badge anymore after a few years anyway, and could as well buy a Geely, Chery or whatever the brand is, as long as the price is right and the product doesn't have horrible reviews...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:24 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Black Falcon Media Group Oy