<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD><i>Quote, originally posted by <b>Hornbag</b> »</i></TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"><p>I totally agree, I would own one!!! As for the Rangrover Sport, they loved it (especially Ged Bulmer), the reason it was excluded was because they believd the BMW X5 was still a better option <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://www.germancarfans.com/images/forums/cwm13.gif" BORDER="0"> . But then why include the 380? It was majorly outclassed by the BF Falcon??? I swear, if they let that car win COTY, I won't buy WHEELS ever again...<p>It's a good car, great in some respects but nope, sorry, it's nope COTY IMO</TD></TR></TABLE><p>Well actually I reckon the 380 is a trully worthy vehicle. It does nothing wrong and to many people, the car is actually better than the BF Falcon. But for guys like you or me, the FWD Mitsu can't take the Falcon <IMG NAME="icon" SRC="http://images.zeroforum.com/smile/emwink.gif" BORDER="0">. However, people aren't all like you or me and for a cheap runabout, but big enough and comfortable enough for the whole family, nothing takes the 380.<p>As for the Sport,<p>any magazine that could ever take the X5 and the ML as better performers than a Land Rover dont have a clue about 4X4s. This is particularly true in Australia where people actually DO have a genuine reason to have a 4X4.<p>And their criticisms about some cars are frankly taken off the enciclopedia of most uncommon excuses to say something bad about a car. Its like they're trying to fill space...