[Ascariss]

https://www.motor1.com/news/249896/2...azer-revealed/









Honestly was not even expecting this to debut. Dare I say it almost looks exciting for Chevy.

[swizzle]

That is absolutely HIDEOUS and wrong in every conceivable way.

I can hear the design studio head saying "I want to do a mashup of the Camaro and the Lexus RX and make it as ungainly as hell."

[Crash]

There is so much going on here... I don’t know what it is? It feels like the Pontiac Grand Am with full plastic add one “over the top” if that makes any sense. Accordingly, it’ll likely sell boat loads.

I don’t see it aging well though...

[paranoidgarliclover]

Doesn't Chevy have a recent concept that sort of looks like this?

I have mixed feelings. The Camaro-inspired version is way, WAY too hard. I'm one of the few who doesn't seem to mind Chevy's new face, so I like (what I assume is) the standard version.

There's actually some elegance to the way the hood transitions to the front fender and doors (at least in the silver version, maybe it's just lighting) and the side surfacing.

All of that is ruined, though, by the tragic D-pillar. Yeah, I get it; floating roofs are "in." But this is like the XC40's floating roof done all WRONG. Argh.

Interior is somber but functional. It moves away from the Playskool look of the Malibu.

I actually think this is a perfectly respectable design (mostly). How much does it cost to change a D-pillar???

[Ascariss]

Originally Posted by paranoidgarliclover

Doesn't Chevy have a recent concept that sort of looks like this?

I actually think this is a perfectly respectable design (mostly). How much does it cost to change a D-pillar???

There was this which had a much better execution I feel.

https://www.netcarshow.com/chevrolet...fnr-x_concept/

As for the D pillar, probably a lot to redesign it and wouldn't happen in a facelift. Curious how well this will do in the market place.

[swizzle]

Couldn't they have called it Nova instead of raping the Blazer name?