CarSpyShots
Quick Member Login:
Forgot password?
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members:
Total Threads:
Total Posts:


There are users
currently browsing forums.
  Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-30-2007, 07:24 PM
SV's Avatar
SV SV is offline
CSS Oldtimer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,175
SV is on a distinguished road
Default

i added the exterior and interior blueprints. i've had both for a while; the exterior blueprint's been mostly done since march or so, but i had to redo the air intakes and add some other details so it would correspond with the final drawing, and i put that off until this weekend. so anyway, here it is...the spec sheet will be up soon also, i've still got to make some revisions to it.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-30-2007, 07:35 PM
2o6 2o6 is offline
CSS Oldtimer
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,787
2o6 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: (SV)

This is so Hot!!!

The Aviva Ave is Better, though.

__________________
Eh.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:45 PM
SV's Avatar
SV SV is offline
CSS Oldtimer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,175
SV is on a distinguished road
Default

first drives are coming in! lol, i couldn't resist:

Quote, originally posted by Autocar »

What is it?

The latest iteration of Montgomery's venerable D-segment car, the SV100.

While shrinking rapidly, the large family car sector still attracts a large number of buyers, and is perhaps more important to Montgomery than it is to any other mass-market carmaker: from the founding FS15 to the well-regarded FC series and the four subsequent iterations of the SV100, the D-segment car has represented the core of Montgomery's range.

Which means the new SV100 has to be good, or else Montgomery will risk losing its core consumer base.

What's it like?

First impressions are of a big, imposing vehicle; this isn't surprising given the roughly 90mm increase in length over the old car. However, what is perhaps most striking is how low and planted the new SV100 looks. Both aggressively flared wheel arches and a relatively low roofline (about 50mm lower than the new Mondeo¬Ěs) contribute to this feel, and in our eyes it lends the car a distinctly rakish look.

Of course the styling itself is also responsible for the SV100's new-found dynamism; showcasing Montgomery's new 'Layered Tension' design theme, many of its cues hint at those of future models. It's certainly bold, with swoopy creases and a distinctive face helping it stand apart from its rivals. It's an altogether refreshing change from the previous model, which many accused of aping the Mk3 Mondeo. Although chrome trimmings are kept to a minimum (in fact, with the exception of the top-drawer LX model, they're entirely absent), the SV100 looks upscale in a way the old car could never hope to achieve. Some may not like it but Montgomery are betting that most will.

Inside, the upscale impression continues. The tops of the dashboard and doors are trimmed with plush soft plastics, as expected these days, and there's a flair to the design here absent in previous SV100s. The Driver-Machine Interlink (DMI) knob, which primarily controls satnav functions, takes some getting used to but after some practice becomes easier to use. Chrome and aluminium trim are used liberally, but not to the near-tasteless extent seen in the Ford. Move down a bit and the materials get a bit harder and cheaper (admittedly in places most owners will never see), but overall the cabin has a more premium feel than just about any rival short of VW's Passat.

Also notable is the abundance of space; thanks to ultra-thin front seats and an expansive 2860mm wheelbase, the SV100 feels spacious in the front and positively cavernous in the rear, although headroom may be tight for taller passengers.

While quality was a significant priority for Montgomery, the primary goal with the new SV100 was to improve efficiency and dynamics. To this end they employed extensive use of high-strength steels in the car's construction and obsessively scrutinized every component for potential weight savings. And we do mean obsessive: even the stereo speakers and rear-view mirror were trimmed down. While these savings are miniscule on their own, they appear to have added up, for despite the SV100's increased size it weighs about 10kg less than before (11-12kg depending on the model if you're into specifics).

At 1466kg our 1.8-litre turbodiesel model is a not insignificant 161kg lighter than the equivalent Mondeo, and with a smaller but more powerful engine delivers better performance. However by class standards performance is only average, with a quoted 9.7-second jaunt to 62mph (though economy is excellent at 51.4mpg). On the road the SV100 feels noticeably livelier than the old car, with eager throttle response.

It's the handling characteristics that really impress, though. The steering is exceptional; you can thank Shannon, who donated their acclaimed rack-and-pinion design, for that. It's light, contributing to the car's agile feel, but not numb; in fact it is perhaps more communicative than any other rival. In some ways the steering is almost too grittily feelsome, and contrasts with the car's refined nature to a degree some may find unsettling; we, however, are not complaining. Body lean was nicely restrained on our conventionally-sprung model. We have yet to drive an SV100 equipped with the available active anti-roll bars, which are claimed to completely eliminate leaning in turns, but the standard car is impressive as it is.

Should I buy one?

It certainly makes a strong argument. The new SV100 is exceptionally spacious, very well-built and drives with an alacrity most rivals would kill for. In virtually every respect, this car is a match for the new Mondeo; the D-segment wars are about to get alot more interesting.


Last edited by SV; 05-22-2008 at 01:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-14-2007, 06:58 PM
2o6 2o6 is offline
CSS Oldtimer
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,787
2o6 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: (SV)

Ultra-Thin Front Seats? IDK, on a longer trip it could get a bit unconfortable.

When is the Comparo going to happen?

__________________
Eh.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-17-2007, 05:44 AM
SV's Avatar
SV SV is offline
CSS Oldtimer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,175
SV is on a distinguished road
Default

two new pictures:




tbh i'm dissapointed with the 3/4; it's better than the last one, i suppose, but in my attempt to make it less cartoony it just came out kinda fuzzy. considering the hours i poured into it (admittedly working slowly) i expected it to be spectacular and it's not...oh well...the interior view is my studio final for art; we had to do an interior and exterior view in one acrylic painting, so i chose to do my own SV100 with some gas station-thing in the back. also took several hours, but i think i'm more pleased with the result.

Last edited by SV; 12-18-2007 at 11:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-17-2007, 04:11 PM
NelsonDesign's Avatar
NelsonDesign NelsonDesign is offline
Car Designer hopeful
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon,United States
Posts: 509
NelsonDesign is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up

I think those are really nice, other than the color choice of the interior
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-17-2007, 07:57 PM
mrfdesign's Avatar
mrfdesign mrfdesign is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 719
mrfdesign is on a distinguished road
Default

i much prefer your second 3/4 view. dunno about the yellow seats tho :-)
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-18-2007, 06:21 AM
driven by design driven by design is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 103
driven by design is on a distinguished road
Default

Hey SV. You're a better painter than I, and most of that interior turned out well but certain aspects (seats, console, shift gate) are awfully geometric and don't match the rest of the motif you established in the doors and on the dashboard, which are nicely done. An excellent job, and one to be proud of. I know you'll improve on the parts you don't like. I think that front profile view is great as well, but I don't know why you neglected the underside. You put so much effort into your shading and reflections and I think you do a fantastic job of it, but the design doesn't pop because you don't really place it against anything, and those black streaks under the tires make the car look taller, and not in a good way. I think you should shade the underside in black and do some kind of color treatment in the background. You spend so much time on these and yet you neglect the backgrounds which only take a few minutes to do! ;)

Last edited by driven by design; 12-18-2007 at 06:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-18-2007, 11:05 PM
2o6 2o6 is offline
CSS Oldtimer
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,787
2o6 is on a distinguished road
Default

GREAT!!! That painting looks gorgeous. Much better than What I can do. I even like the Yellow Interior. The 3/4 Sedan is Readable, it looks great. I could see myself driving that. One complaint, why does the tires on the front 3/4 look so thin?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-14-2009, 11:11 PM
rv65 rv65 is offline
CSS Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,113
rv65 is on a distinguished road
Default

Did a little review update.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Black Falcon Media Group Oy