Theres an article about this in the November wheels magazine... and they have an illustration (by Autobild Huckfeldt) of what it could look like...
Would this mean that the MLK name isnt going to be used or is this another model.... with the MLK looking like a baby ML and the GLK lookin like a baby GL?
In the article is mentions that .... its not meant to "be capable of any serious off-roading - this is a four-wheel-drive on-roader. Also says"itll also be offered in rear-wheel-drive which will "cut-weight, cost and consumption, in an attempt to achieve maximum sales volumes"
Its dimension will be "within 50mm of BMW's X3 in every key measurement" so itll be similar to the next X3 and that "weight will also be almost identical, within 30kg"
"The GLK will be powered by a wide variety of petrol and turbo-diesel engines, starting off with a 152Kw 3.0-litre V6 for rear-drive models, and an uprated turbo-diesel range, including a 187kw 3.2-litre V6. The ubiquitous petrol V8 version will appear, and AMG will provide a 360kw GLK 63"
SO does that mean the MLK name (or model) aint happening?.... and y does MB have to stick a V8 and AMG V8 in every car they make... its ridiculous